Why on earth?

  • Learn why we want to organise societies in a different way, earth-wide.

    Click here.

  • See something I’ve been working on since reading some of Astrid Lindgren’s thoughts on violence.

    Click here.

  • Find out more … about what YOU can change.

    We’re located in Stockholm Sweden, but anywhere you are … if you think our proposals sound a good fit with your way of seeing the world, consider contacting us here.

  • Complex ideas not complicated ones.

  • To do for intuition, arationality, high-level domain expertise and gut feeling what Marie Curie achieved in respect of radioactivity research.

  • I’ve started posting the first “business model canvas” drafts in this section.

    The second one — a unified one — is now accessible here:

    sverige2.earth/unified

    They’re both structured around two corporate entities and four workstreams.

    The first corporate entity is responsible only for innovating digital services and products from existing technologies and architectures. It covers off Workstream A, and is informed by the invention-influenced Workstream B, which is a responsibility of the second corporate entity below.

    The first one was to be located either in Ireland or Liverpool UK, or both. Its infrastructure services (hardware and cloud, etc.) would have been Irish-based for hardware plus cloud management services delivery, and Nordic-based for cloud. It would have almost certainly involved big-tech in both instances. AI innovation only would quite probably have been the focus of Liverpool.

    The second business model canvas (already linked to above) has now proposed consolidating all activity and installations in Scandinavia.

    In either of the two cases, the second corporate entity will continue to be located in Stockholm and other places in Sweden, as well as outwith its territory where it shall decide.

    Its mission will be to invent and deliver digital services and products on brand-new architectures (both hardware- and software-related), designed as a result to maximise intuitive/neurodiverse thinking & related using both secrecy-sensitive and secrecy-positive strategies. (See this draft chronology.)

    In this way, we will be recreating a digital form of pencil and paper, and thus find ourselves able to revert to historical levels of truly free, productive and channelled nonconformist & creative thinking, where the predictably delivery of an unpredictable and immensely distributed genius across all levels of hierarchical organisations becomes commonplace.

    Applications of these proposed technologies are aimed at resolving complex problems, not complicated ones.

    An example of this can be found here: the “innovation for the risk-averse” whitepaper.

  • Click through to three pages:

    1. Activities

    2. Research

    3. Products

  • Recently, some large AI corporations have been caught training-up large language models — generative AI, in other words — using unpaid for intellectual property with the argument that what’s easily accessible on the web is freely available to repurpose without attribution, compensation or recognition.

    Compensify Me is what immediately came to my mind.

    Click here to find out more.

  • Contact us, if you like what you’ve seen — society-wide and in an ethical business sense, too.

    Click here.